MST. SHARIFAN BIBI THROUGH SPECIAL ATTORNEY versus ALLAH RAKHA
Section 5 of the Succession Act (XXXXX of 1925), section 273, defines the delay in the case related to the delay of each day in filing a review petition on the basis that the applicant was an 85-year-old woman and her The death of the co-applicant was accepted because the old age cannot be considered as a cause for condolences, and as far as the death of the participant applicant was concerned, the documentary evidence was neither supported nor the expected participant request. Guzar's successors, who were the major issues and parties to the current review, did not explain it every day. ?? It is argued that the Appellant Dietary Sheet was not provided to the applicants for the three reasons that were first canceled, the delay was not disputed in the petition for relief, secondly, the Appellate Court In the appeal filed against the successor, the order was not binding. Applicants who applied for the memorandum of appeal and third certified copies of the appeal memorandum after a period of approximately 5 months were delayed out of r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
