Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR AHMAD versus STATE

Before the arrest of Section 498 Explosive Regulation (XLV of 1860), Sections 379, 440, 148 and 149, the accused was denied the FIR and with the help of the tractor and rotavator to destroy the complainant's cotton crop. Specific role of, was added. He is alleged to have been fully involved in the incident during the investigation and the recovery of arms along with the tractor was not disclosed, but the accused complained of false involvement in the case. No accused was charged by the manufacturer. The record revealed that the accused, after being released on ad interim bail, used the privilege of making threats to the complainant and witnesses against whom the complaint was lodged with the police, the suspect at the time of the incident. The party occupied mainland. The law and the trial court issued warrants for his arrest, challan was presented and a teaching evaluation of the evidence was started on the trial record. There was initially enough evidence to link the accused to the commission of the crime, the accused said. It was imposed that he does not deserve an extraordinary discount on the pre-arrest bail, in which case the application was dismissed and the interim bail granted to the accused was returned. top advocates from Kunri lawyer