MST. MUSARRAT NAZAR versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION ROHILANWALI
Article 16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Constitution Petition The cancellation of the relevant FIR police officer was directed by the High Court to record the statement of the applicant / alleged abductor which was available to the applicant in court. The statement said he was not kidnapped. Someone; that he was older, suicidal, adult, and dealt with Nika's own free will and will, and that no one had committed adultery with his grandfather, Apparently he had committed a crime with the accused, who also paid the applicant a dour amount. Her father, the High Court, allowed the constitutional application that the applicant, being a sui jury, have signed a free agreement with Nika with her will and accused, and in 1979 under the Enforcement (Enforcement) Ordinance of Adultery. There was no case. Accordingly \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Lala rukh lawyer