MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus STATE
Against an order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, sections 516A and 439 of the Narcotic Substance Act (XXV of 1997), section 9 (c) and 32 supremacy were filed, under which the car The applicant's request for superannuation was denied. According to the provisions of Section 32 of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, a car can only be confiscated when it is found that the owner of the car is also included in the commission of the crime applicant, in the present case no The accused was not and there was no evidence against him. In order to link it with the crime, the applicant had prepared a book of registration which was in his name and his name was executed by the accused and in this case there was no evidence against the applicant. In his presence he had achieved success. The case for interim custody of the car was approved by the trial court with the permission of the trial court as its owner to approve the decree for superseding the car in favor of the patty. Tuner is subject to reasonable guaranteed deposit collection
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Dunyapur lawyer