Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus ASGHAR ALI

The fact that section 4alal of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) and 195 panel codes (XLV of 1860), sections 471, 420, 406, 193 and 34 (1973), Article 199 abolish the proceedings of the constitutional petition were admitted. That the plaintiff had filed a lawsuit against the applicant. XXXVII, R1, CPC for receipt of the money and the petitioners had moved the petition for defense leave stating that the application was subject to the submission of a guarantee bail bond, which along with the documents guaranteed. The document was also submitted because no such documents were released by the Revenue Authorities and not one of the applicants was the owner of the said land, the applicant was alleged to have produced fake documents and filed before the court. Submitted before, after which notice was issued to the applicants for exhibition, instead To prove the documents as valid. At the time of the approval of the leave to settle the case, delay in settlement of the case was initiated and the petition filed for a reconsideration petition was submitted to the trial court for the purpose of subjecting the case to section 767676, CR P.C. The authority to prosecute was not granted, the trial magistrate can hear and have the power of trial, while the applicant can prove his innocence during the court hearing while serving his sentence. The original case was later dismissed, no proceedings could be initiated, it was overturned, because, if any of the parties were accused of presenting false documents during the trial. famous high court advocate from Kallur Kot lawyer