Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE

Section 2 302 / 34re Validating Evidence The incident was an unexpected incident and it was a blind murder of persons who were found dead field dead body, they were not prosecuted as the accused were not named in the FIR. And the co-accused were suspected. The police declared the accused innocent during the investigation and they were kept in column 2 of the challan motive because the suspect was drowned in mystery, otherwise it was only a weapon and did not prove anything, medical evidence. Disagreeable contradictory evidence contradicts the testimony of the witnesses' testimony was available to the accused against the accused. Extra judicial evidence was a weak type of evidence and could not be safely relied on until only one accused was superior. Independent proof of the standard case / offensive weapon is not confirmed. About two months after the incident, since the cause of death was not announced by the doctor, the recovery proceedings could not be entered into the eyes of the law, especially when there was a violation of section 103, CRPC suspects were not involved in the case as there was no material available on record to link them to the crime. power of attorney advocate Village Sunder lawyer