Find a Lawyer

RANA SHEHRAM SHOUKAT versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR

Regulin 18, Provo Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Intra-Court Appeal Candidates failed on more than four papers Candidates failed on more than eight papers and were not allowed to take the final exam. Practical papers should be considered as a paper, and if such a rule were applied, the number of filling papers would be uncontrolled. This is the first rule for Regln 18, the rules of the Bahauddin Zakaria University exams forbid the candidate to attend the final exam if he fails the maximum. More than eight lower-class papers, except first-class, while the other Privoso allowed candidates with eight papers to appear in the final exams but gained the university's authority to withhold the result till the lower-level papers were approved. ? Part F, Theory and Part II (Practical on the other hand), two separate papers which were compiled by the university authorities were valid E-Bahauddin Zakaria Regln 18 of the University Examination Regulations, failing more than eight papers. Was not eligible to attend the Annual Examination without clearing the Fall papers' back blog, the candidate, who passed the first year examination on the first attempt, will be credited by the University. No papers from the first year were included for the same nine papers and such a candidate was entitled to attend the annual examination under the second provision of Regulation 18 of the Bahauddin Zakariya University Examination Regulations. inheritance advocates near Daud Khel lawyer