Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NASIR versus STATE

Section & & Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 439 applicant who was convicted and sentenced under Section 3 (4) of the Punjab Marriages. The two courts below were defamatory of law and facts as this ordinance was abolished and could not be punished. The Petitioner further claimed that the trial court could only prosecute it under the functions of their marriages (prohibition of unfair expenditure) and that the Additional Advocate General of 2000 had accepted the offer and had also submitted Whether in the circumstances of this case, it was appropriate that in view of the parties' suggestion offered, the High Court remanded for another decision, and set aside the unwanted decisions and the case was remanded. ? Trial Court ys and Spare Spending Expenses for Decision on Merit and Marital Functions (Ordinance, 2000) immigration advocate from Mardan lawyer