CHIEF ENGINEER N.A., P.W.D., GILGIT versus GHULAM RAZA THROUGH L.RS.
AXXII, R 4, O XLI, Rr 11 (2) and 19 and O VI, R 17 Appeal for Rehabilitation Impact on the Enforcement of the Legal Heritage of the Scope The Court of Appeal rejected the appeal on this basis. done. In the application for reinstatement, the deceased defendant's legal heirs were not enforced. The validity of the justification was treatable. The courts had various applications, both autonomous and the parties' application rules and procedures including legal law. There was ample option to allow editing of fodder. Were not meant to dispel people's grievances and create obstacles to justice. The courts had to distinguish between treating and curing techniques and the matter had to be decided on merit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
