Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, ISLAMABAD versus COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION/SETTLEMENT OFFICER, GILGIT

Sections 4, 59, 11, 12, 16, 17, 17A, 31 and 34 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 23 and 24, the right to property, public purpose, non-compulsory acquisition of land Compliance with the provision of the Acquisition Act, 1894 Impact Collector Land Acquisition approved the award on 23 6 1998, compensation was paid to the landlord on 8 4000 Respondent filed an 8 compound comprehensive interest grant on Friday 25 2001 2001. The Collector submitted the application for, according to which the Collector passed the by-award on 249 2001. The Acquiring Authority accepted the subpoena before the referee court but the property right for any benefit was not protected by the constitution as a fundamental right for public purpose and under the Land Acquisition Act of the companies. The mandatory acquisition for 1894 was. However, a concession in the Fundamental Rights Land Act, 1894, was a special law that provided landlords with treatment and protection rights, which could not possibly resist the compulsory acquisition of their land through the Governmental Land Acquisition Act 1894. Provided that, if the acquiring land may enter the acquired land only after it has been notified of its acquisition and published in the official Gazette, the provisions of section 4, 59 will not be complied with. This Act shall, in good faith and in the spirit of the Land Acquisition Act, 1908, neither the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, nor any provision of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, provide for the procurement under section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. To the extent the restriction was granted, accordingly the appeal was dismissed. solicitors from Kohat lawyer