Find a Lawyer

OBID U LLA H versus STATE

Under Section 10 and 11 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 164, 244A & 361 Convention of Martyrs (10 of 1984), Article 47 Statements recorded under Section 164, CRPC accused of understanding the language of foreign witnesses CRPC Complainant, a foreign female tourist who failed to refuse to give notice to the accused before recording witness statements under Section 1, CRPC Complainant proceeded on a deserted mountain path He accused the accused of rape and raped him. The appellant, who was an uneducated person, claimed that he was not informed of the proceedings under Section 16464, CCPC, and that the magistrate's trial court had tried to engage the lawyer for his defense before convicting the accused. Was given no chance and was sentenced to two years in prison. However, on appeal, the trial court found the accused to be valid / the appellant was an illiterate person who could not be underserved. The complainant and his witnesses, all preliminary statements of foreigners, record their statements before the magistrate under section ?6464. The PC suspect, an illiterate person, did not expect to be acquainted with the prosecution, on behalf of the magistrate. It was necessary to facilitate the engagement of the accused. No notice was given before a lawyer for defending himself and his witnesses recorded statements under 164 of 164, the accused magistrate provided under CRPC facilities section PC6161, CRPC. Failure to adopt the constitution which he was bound to follow, in which the magistrate was unable to record the statements under Section 164, CRPC. property advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer