Find a Lawyer

RAMZAN SHAH versus MAMA JIL

Article 19A Northern Territory Council Legal Framework (Amendment) Order 1999, Article 24, Part III of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Articles 199, 23 and 24 of the Constitutional Petition to maintain the applicants through the civil suit. Claimed and prayed for the occupied land as heritage property. The order was partially forbidden in favor of the applicants, the petitioners appealed against the trial court's finding and the appellate court prayed through the petitioners before the Judicial Commissioner, who moved the second appeal Maintained a hearing dispute. The matter did not come to an end and the matter went to the Revenue Forum and the Revenue Commissioner passed an order under which the applicants have filed legal proceedings in the constitutional petition. The constitutional petition was an unusual remedy, which the order passed by the relevant authority was illegal. False, natural justice or fundamental rights recognized by the Constitution and no cure was available The Constitution and Legal Framework Order, 1994 recognized the fundamental right to property provided it was a permanent right of civil court to the competent courts On which the verdict has been issued. Case Applicants property Property Claims were not found with the property and they failed to prove any personal or fundamental rights infringement. us immigration advocates from Gawadar lawyer