Find a Lawyer

NOOR NABI versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR

Sections 63 and 64 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 57A & 54 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Oral Contract for Sale of Section 8, Sections 63 and 64 of the Easements Act or protection of any license Evidence of, Defendant filed a separate claim for specific performance of the contract, claiming that the plaintiffs were the owners of the land in the filed dispute that the plaintiff's predecessor had entered into an oral contract with the plaintiff in interest. The defendant paid the seller the total cost of the sale. His possession was transferred to the trial court under the plaintiff's case of a stable judgment, and the lower appellate court dismissed the trial in which the applicants / plaintiffs had legal status regarding the trial. Had failed to prove a verbal agreement to sell in the interest case with the plaintiff's predecessor. The defendants were either in possession of a sinner or the licensees / plaintiffs could not, for the first time, file a petition with the High Court under Sections 63 and 64 of the Inquiry Act 188 as no such plea was raised nor was there any The matter was presented. There was neither evidence nor evidence presented in this regard, especially when he did not acknowledge himself as a licensor, especially Such as when he did not acknowledge himself as r \ n \ r \ n us immigration advocates from Khoski lawyer