Find a Lawyer

PERVEZ AHMAD versus STATE

In connection with the recovery of the evidence of Sections 9 (c) and 9 (b), the witness dismissed that only 200 grams of marijuana was recovered from the accused, the other recovery witness was left without any reason for the prosecution which led to the prosecution's case. Had created doubts. Thus the crime of the accused was committed under Section 9 (b) of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, which was changed for his offense under Section 9 (c) of the Act and his sentence was reduced to five years. Thousands of rupees in case of a fine of Rs 5000 \ r \ n tax advocates from Barbar Loi lawyer