Find a Lawyer

IJAZ ALI versus D.P.O.

Article 18 Crimes of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution, The petitioner / accused in the investigation of illegal and unauthorized investigation was that the matter was investigated. The first section was by HO. The police station is concerned that, after the completion of the investigation, his innocence was detected, but on the telephonic message of the DPO, the investigation was handed over to D-P, and D-section P re-investigated. Initially, the DPO had no jurisdiction to change the investigation in this case or is the case being re-investigated in connection with the investigation under Article 18 of the Police Order, 2002, pursuant to Section H earlier. The entire exercise of the relevant D-section P in initiating a re-investigation of the matter which was concluded was not only without authority, but also against it. The Zee. Instead of changing the verification of the rules and regulations was a color exercise, under the jurisdiction of the DPO, if he was not satisfied with the investigative procedure, he could put the matter before the District Investigation Board to amend the investigation. If he or she feels this way or gets information from a person, then they are given a reason to change their note. Investigation DPO may also refer the matter to the Additional Inspector General of Police as listed: Article 18 of the Police Order 2002, but under no circumstances can the DPO change the direct investigation or any other Investigating / monitoring by person who has already done so. Power immigration advocates phone number from Muzaffargarh lawyer