RANA ASHFAQ AHMED versus STATE
The grant of the charges against the accused allegedly in Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 419, 420, 468 and 471, was that he had lectured at the Government College after obtaining the decree of forgery. Had joined the job as an employee, the copy was attached by the accused. According to an appointment letter issued by the competent authority under which he was held as Assistant Lecturer Prosecution, he could not find evidence that he could lodge a case with the accused as a crime against him. No offense against them has come under the purview of the Prohibited Clause. Section 497, CR PC grants, like guarantees, were a rule, even in cases, and denial was an exception.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer
