Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHTIAQ versus STATE

Section 302 Definition of Evidence The main witness, who was a close relative of the complainant, was not presented by the prosecutor as he did not pay the questions to the prosecution witnesses, nor did anyone see the defendant firing. He involved a vehicle / jeep which could not be identified. The statement of the same witness stated that the accused was not in Azad Kashmir area, there was no result of recovering money from the accused at the time of the incident, which he allegedly alleged. The deceased was paid before his death, was not presented by the prosecution. Recovery of the crime vacancy and the weapon of crime from the scene of the incident were not helped in the prosecution case because of the forensic science exp. According to the report, empty property was not removed from the arms. Because the crime prosecutor's story was very suspicious, he was unable to rely on an appeal against an unknown order, and Sade was acquitted of the charge and released from custody. immigration advocates phone number from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer