Find a Lawyer

SAJID RASHID versus STATE

Sections 324, 337 and 34 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), accused of wounding during a testimonial testimony of Section 13 evidence, but eyewitnesses reported on Medco's legal reports I have been told that the injured were kept on record by the prosecution, but the courts below. For this reason, such news was ignored that the document not presented in the evidence was not presented in evidence by the prosecution and could not be relied upon against the accused for the purpose of sentencing, but if he did If the prosecution raised doubt, its results cannot be ruled out. While there is no benefit to the case and the accused, consideration cannot be denied. The number and nature of the wounds appearing on the accused person, which was hidden by eyewitnesses, showed that the two sides sustained injuries on each other, and that the serious impact of the incident required serious consideration. Was set aside and demanded that the trial be heard in the trial court so that they can decide the decision. lawer from fb area from Mohmand lawyer