MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED versus MOHSIN BAIG
Sections 9, 10 and 22 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 19, filed a writ petition for recovery of the effect of the High Court Banking Court that the suit filed by the plaintiff bank was dismissed, the plaintiff said. Had filed an appeal against the plaintiff. The decision of the Banking Court on the plaintiff's bank was that the matter was very much in accordance with section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1908, because the respondent's counsel acknowledged the responsibility within the limitation period. In which the effect of the confession in writing was clear. The limit was made in section 19 of the Act, 1908. The present hearing was filed on 17 11 2001, according to the date of confession on 28 28 10 2003, before it was confirmed on 14 12 1998 and another confession on 17 11 2001, before its expiry. The lawyer did. Plaintiff's case filed by the plaintiff on 28 10 2003, was within the bounds of circumstances Trial case / Banking court could not maintain the result of the record on the face of the circumstances The order of the banking court was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer