Find a Lawyer

STATE versus RASHID ALI

Section Cri32 Cri Criminal Code (V 181898), Articles 943 & 516A pending the custody and disposal of a vehicle involved in a detention case. Respondents were restored to the respondent, who was the registered owner of the car and was doing the car rental business, renting that the fugitive suspect had entered a photocopy of the rental agreement between the respondent and the fugitive suspect Was also recovered during a search of the vehicle. Submitted by the police in which the defendant was not charged, the respondent was not aware of any criminal activity of the accused and in the rental agreement it was found between the defendant and the fugitive accused that if the car was occupied The defendant will not be held liable for any illegal or criminal activity, the defendant will not be liable and said that the contract was not disputed, in which case the charge was already settled and sufficient material was available which established that The car in question was owned by the respondent, who was not aware of the fact that the drug was being transported in it. No legal weakness was found in the bail order. famous high court advocate from Goular Khel lawyer