MESSRS SAPPHIRE TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED versus PAKISTAN THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE
Section 3 Import Policy Order, 1993 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 18 and 199 Constitutional petition Versus of Import Policy, 1993 The applicant company was charged with fees for opening loan letters, raised by the applicant. It was alleged that such a fee was a violation of the Constitution, as the government was not providing any service against such fees. The government provided special benefits and privileges to the importers under the Import Policy Order, 1993, as they were not previously allowed to import goods that required an import license, import permit or clearance permit but the Import Policy Order, Under 1993, importers were allowed to do so without such restrictions if such licensing system were in force and if importers imported such articles without such licenses, they would have violated customs laws. To protect the importers from violating such laws, they were given special privileges and privileges to import such repetitions. Such a policy was in the interest of the welfare of the citizens because of the importers and exporters. The free competition will benefit the citizens and it was permissible under Article 18 (b) of the Constitution when the government chose to confer any advantage or privilege on the importation of such items or only through the registration of importers and goods. After opening the direct letter credit, the government can import the benefits or privileges offered to them as well And in the export sector Ltd Import of services can receive the appropriate fee, the Import Policy Order 1993. Request for withdrawal from circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Tarbela lawyer