Find a Lawyer

NIAZ AHMAD versus STATE

Section 498 interim pre-arrest bail, although the accused's affidavit was lodged in the FIR with regard to the allegations leveled against him, but in the FIR, mentioning the name of the accused cannot be guaranteed in any case. Is that the money settlement dispute can be justified. There was a conspiracy between the parties and they both knew each other very well that the names of the accused in the FIR were sufficient for their involvement, due to the disputes between the parties on the basis of the dispute. It was terminated. There was no need for a deep appreciation of the case at the civil nature bailout stage in the settlement of accounts respecting any plot transactions because the prejudice of any party in the trial phase has already been included in the investigation and There are no reports of any misuse of the interim exception. Pre-arrest bail was appearing on record immigration advocates phone number from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer