MUHAMMAD TAHIR versus STATE
The name of the accused, who was recovered from the accused during the interrogation of Section 497 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 392 bail, looted property (car), was also listed in the FIR with a special character, At the time, he had committed and with other co-accused. , The robbery case had already begun in the trial and the trial court's report revealed that the trial could be heard within six months, in which case the request for bail was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Bajaur lawyer
