Find a Lawyer

KANWAR ABDUL HAYEE versus RENT CONTROLLER, RAWALPINDI CANTT.

Sections 17 and 2 (g) of the Ordinance of the West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1969), Article 13 Civil Code (VV 1908), O XVI, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition The petitioner denies the interim orders that the landlord and the tenant petitioner / tenant relationship claimed that he was not the respondent's but his mother's tenant and since the disputed property owner was in favor of the respondents Was not transferred, nor does he have any locus standi to request evacuation, and neither can he. In the dispute the tenant should be declared the landlord of the property, so that his reasoning could be proved by the request of the MEO's office to ask for a record keeper, but he was rejected. The constitutional petition was also invalidated. The Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963 does not require that the landlord should own the property or have certain leasehold rights. According to Becco's eligibility definition, the landlord is entitled to receive rent in respect of any building, whether in his or her account or for the benefit of another person, etc., the tenant. 'S request was rightly rejected by the rental controller. , Which had no jurisdiction to determine the title question in the property, the interim injunction, the constitutional petition against it was not heard. property advocates from Mamu kunjan lawyer