Find a Lawyer

JAFFAR MEHMOOD MALIK versus CH. KHALID HUSSAIN

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition re-counting of votes Election Tribunal on oral request of failed candidates stated that the candidates had directed the re-counting of the votes which the candidates had returned, the election. The Commission's order in the constitutional petition that the re-counting of tribunal votes was possible only after the consent of both parties or after the conclusion of the trial, including the recording of evidence, or that the Election Tribunal had the power to do so without recording the evidence. Order the counting of votes, where the parties have contracted to settle the matter For their own and without the recording of evidence, the unanimous party was found guilty of re-enumeration, except where the party denied the consensus or offered a false view of the situation. ? Or it has been alleged that in the present case the applicant / returning candidates have been subjected to fraud or have not given their consent to count the votes without registering any evidence. Rather, after the recording of the evidence requested the decision of the election petition, nor was the approval and repetition, the disapproval order cannot be considered a legal order on this score, the disapproval order was declared without legal authority and It had no legal effect; filing an election petition will be considered pending before the Election Tribunal which will be decided in accordance with the law. immigration advocates email from Turbat lawyer