Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ AHMAD versus AZIZ AKHTAR

O VII, R 2 suit filed a withdrawal petition against the money recipient, the landlord, who was his tenant, the application was finally accepted in the Supreme Court and the applicant was excluded from the execution proceedings. Was filed, then the respondent filed the tile for collection of rent arrears. The courts below gave the respondent rent arrears at the rate of Rs. 350 per month, while the petitioner's case was that of eviction proceedings. The defendant also claimed Rs. 150 per month in the plaintiff filed by the defendant for recovery of the arrears. The rent was that even when the defendant first appeared as his own witness, he maintained that the rent amount was Rs 150 per month. The lawyer for the defendant was not convinced to submit the petition to the courts below. I was not justified in determining the amount received from the applicants at the rate of Rs 350 per month, based on the facts on record, the improper decree was not sustainable according to which I was changed ask a advocate free from Mian Walli lawyer