MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus STATE
Testimony of Section 295B / 34 Evidence After the closure of the proceedings, the trial court answered the question to the accused, in response to which the accused confessed to the crime of earnings and declared the proceedings embarrassing. After apologizing to her, she had to apologize. There was nowhere provided for such a course to be adopted, nor could there be any questioning or alleged admission of any kind, and the trial court could not be relied upon in such a case. Handing over was undoubtedly charged with serious prejudice. The trial court's decision was set aside, allowing the appeals, to be considered pending before a session judge for a fresh verdict in accordance with the case law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Musafir Khana lawyer
