MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus STATE
The presence of both witnesses, who were injured during the incident at the valuation of Sections 302 (b), 324, 337d, 337f (II), 148 and 149, is standing on the record when making a statement. Under Section 161, CR was specifically named the accused on the day of the PCP incident, known as witnesses prior to the incident, with both eyewitnesses supporting the prosecution's case in the trial court. According to the circumstances and the manner in which the accused along with the other accomplices were involved. Convicted of murder of the deceased and hurt eye witnesses Medical evidence also supported the eye witness, there was no reason to make false accusations against the eye witness, who was a minor child, against whom no one enmity. Or not, both witnesses were innocent, credible, and the statements of the truth and the testimony of those witnesses were impressive, reliable, depending on whether the defendant upheld the appeal and the conviction. To the extent of the accused, the dismissal and his death sentence have been confirmed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Vehari lawyer