Find a Lawyer

TANVEER HUSSAIN ALIAS LUDU versus STATE

Sections 2, 2, 7 337 J & 380 The value of the evidence cannot be asserted with the defendant taking the biscuit, which is the sole reason for which the witnesses were unconscious as well as the evidence of the adjourned prosecution. Could not find enough to connect with, even medical evidence did not reveal with conviction that the deceased was dead. Chemical Examiner is reported to have been eating or drinking biscuits. It was also not enough to say that the deceased had died of any poison. The complainant had claimed in the FIR that the accused had taken Rs 12,000 worth of gold jewelery, but no one had snatched the articles. Did not see that gold ornaments and money was not recovered from the possession of the accused was also not recovered from the place which was in the exclusive possession of the accused and was only informed that the weapon. It has been hidden and no public witness was involved in the recovery of the weapon. Both police officers acknowledged that no attempt was made to join the public witnesses, although there were some shops at a fortress distance from the recovery site as a contentious piece of evidence in the Ackler account on the rifle's recovery. There were. The accused was already found inadequate for linking the commission to the alleged crime, the prosecution was not secure under the circumstances, the prosecution in the cases, without any doubt, failed to prove the case against the accused, the trial case. 'S hearing was declared inappropriate, and he was indicted. He was acquitted of the charges and was set at liberty solicitors from Bahawalpur lawyer