Find a Lawyer

FAZAL ULLAH SIDDIQUI versus STATE

Sections 9 (vi), 10 and 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 were appealed to the Supreme Court on charges of corruption and malpractices in the circumstance, who was the Land Acquisition Officer in the present case, 29 5 2001 He was arrested and ordered to have been released on bail on 19, 2003, thus being kept in jail for a total period of 22 months while the High Court limited the sentence to 2/2 years which led to It took advantage of Article 382B, CRPC. It was alleged, though in his official capacity, that he awarded the landlord with compensation awards, but it is proof that the landlord was sent to the Director Settlement and Land Record for certification before the landlord made the actual payment. But some of the questions were raised in the office and earlier. They were settled, paid to the landlords, based on the fact that the original payment was made after the transfer of the landlord based on the awards given by the accused. In such diminishing circumstances, the sentence (which includes the benefit of Section 382B, CRPC) will meet the conclusion of justice already passed by the accused, the IAS officer said. best law firms from Kamra lawyer