Find a Lawyer

ANWAR KHAN AND ANOTHER versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the denial of the evidence was not brought on the record which shows that the accused Confession was a crime. A person's confessional statement in a forced, unlawful influence, torture, or in situations where he or she is compelled to do so, if found to be voluntary and confident, should not be dismissed solely because of its trial. Withdrew. The prosecution provided sufficient direct evidence and even if the accused's confessional statement was refused to be considered, the accusation against the accused would still be proved. The recovery of the opium and marijuana prohibited by the vehicle in which the accused person and the accomplices were traveling was proved by direct evidence, and the accused, in his statement under Section 1 Section 1, CRPC, presented before the Judicial Magistrate. Had confessed to the crime. There is no discount to the extent of the accused till the High Court verdict. The case of the lady suspect was intriguing and would stand in line with the other female suspect, whom the trial court acquitted with the observation that she was probably not aware of carrying drugs in the vehicle by her co-accused. The mere fact that the car used for the crime belonged to the son-in-law of the accused and she was also traveling in the car, it would not be enough to suggest that she was drugged in the car. That the allegation against him did not prove beyond reasonable doubt, and that the prosecutor could not produce any credible evidence to prove that the case was successful. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Mangowal lawyer