Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FEROZE AND OTHERS versus MUHAMMAD JAMAAT ALI

Section 115 High Court Amendment Jurisdiction to Find Final Results of Fact by the Following Courts The various civil principles cannot be bothered by the High Court in other civil appeals, under section 115 CPC The review is very limited in jurisdiction unless two courts record it. The finding of facts has not exercised the jurisdiction which they have exercised or the jurisdiction over which they have been exercised, in which the exercise of the jurisdiction of the amended jurisdiction to find the facts simultaneously by the High Court While limiting the exercise of its powers when assessing the legality of decisions and decrees. 5 115 CPC, the High Court cannot be bothered to ascertain the facts, however such false evidence is on the scrutiny of the evidence, and there are different viewpoints on the evidence. Intervention can be made if either of the following courts has false evidence. While reviewing or evaluating the record, a few pieces of evidence that have been left out of the comments, which have a direct impact on the issues involved in the case, are also open to intervention. Where the approach of the courts below is perverse, the High Court does not sit on appeal to the concurrent decisions of the trial court and the lower appellate court. The jurisdiction of the review jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of the review, although compared with the powers of the appellate court, is not strictly equivalent to the appellate forum, the jurisdiction of the High Court is limited and limited to those cases where property advocate from Sehwan lawyer