Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN ALIAS PUNOO versus MUHAMMAD YUNUS

Section 8 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), the Section 42 suit appealed to the defendants of the Supreme Court for the possession that the defendant's father was given the suit land for the construction of the house on the condition that Upon leaving the aforesaid village, the defendants will terminate the structure of the house and hand over the suit to the plaintiffs. Defendants of the suit claimed that the land in the dispute was purchased by their father from the plaintiff's father, the trial court had ruled in favor of the suit filed by the plaintiff, but the appeals court did The trial court's decision below and the judgment passed by the appellate court were reversed, however, the appeal passed by the High Court claimed ownership of the trial court through the decision to restore the reverse reaction. The same thing his father had purchased from defendant's father through a sale deed photo was allegedly unregistered for sale of the suit deed in favor of the defendant's father, though it was required by law to be registered. The sale of the dependents by the accused will not give them any favor, nor can they be found in evidence. At any stage, the trial court correctly ruled that the plaintiff filed a lawsuit within the case, rejecting the defendant's claim on the basis of the unregistered document decision and the appeal court below. The order passed was rightfully suspended by an invalid judgment restoration order. The trial court passed in favor of the plaintiffs property advocates from Cherat lawyer