Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR versus STATE

Section 2 evidence2 In view of the value of the evidence, the prosecution's non-witnesses supported the witnesses, the prosecution's witnesses were related to the defendant, their evidence could not be relied upon, as they could not be prosecuted with the defendant or the complainant. There was no standard relationship. Witnesses were not charged with any animosity for the destruction of their evidence, nor were they presented for any reason as to why they should falsely implicate my relationship, if it proved to be natural. Are witnesses. And their statements showed conviction and truth that the accused, in very low words, claimed that the eyewitnesses, who had illicit relations with the deceased girl, had in fact killed the accused and falsely accused him, Was ill, unnatural against the record No such suggestion was positively given to witnesses at the device cross-examination, CNP said it was not stated in its statements under Sections 242 and 342, CCP C said that it was not considered worthwhile in any club with which the victim was beaten by the accused, also recovered on the suspect's identity. The victim was beaten and her recovery was testified by the police authorities as the police officers were not charged with any kind of hostility or reversal, according to the testimony of the policemen, according to the medical report and the police officer. The alleged disparity between the reports could not be excluded, the material was ineligible, the witnesses' statements were contradicted when the investigating officer testified to the documents and the post-mortem report proved that the FIR was lodged best advocate from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer