Find a Lawyer

ZEEGUM SALEEM KHAN versus MIR ALAM

A. VIII, R11, sections 100 and 115 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), the dismissal of the plaintiffs 42 and 44, rejected the contention that the nature of the dispute was factual. Which cannot be resolved without recording the evidence. The seed order was challenged by a review petition, which was accepted by the District Judge and the case was dismissed under OVII, R 11, CPC, which challenged the order through a writ petition, Which was accepted and the district judge's decision vacated, the restitution order was approved by the trial court, the trial court directed the matter to proceed according to law. The valid writ petition was not admissible as the proper alternative method of appeal was available to the respondents; Appropriate treatment provided by the Appellate Law under the CPC, by the District Judge under Section 115, the application under section 44 of the Interim Jammu and Kashmir Interim Act, 1974 in relation to the same matter under different rules. There was no multi-faceted action, which would escalate the conflict and ensure litigation, which was not the essence of the law, had to be banned by the court using jurisdiction under section 44 of the Azad Jammu. And the Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, especially when there was an alternative alternative under the modest procedure, which was cheap, efficient and fast, as well as the inquiry by the High Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction. Was placed by the District Judge divorce advocates from Liaquat Pur lawyer