Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus MUHAMMAD RAZZAQ

Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 337 F (v), 337 A (I) and 337 A (3) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42 bail Appeals for Cases The following courts, after keeping a record of the case, gave proper permission for the accused's bail, whose bail orders were challenged in the Supreme Court, while considering the issue of bail. The facts and circumstances were temporarily considered in the case. In this case and once the court had come to the conclusion that there was no reasonable basis for believing that the accused had committed a non-bailable offense, to his satisfaction, the bail court had the authority to release such accused, The charges against them had to be considered. FIR, 5161 by the police, statements made under the CCPC and other abusive material against the accused, as well as the nature of the accused's gravity and the degree of conviction that may have occurred in those circumstances. The issue was also to be considered by the court on cancellation of bail, different from the bail approval case. The Shariah court had truly maintained that the accused would not disturb the Supreme Court's temporary view of the court. Bail cases, when justified in the light of the record of the case where jurisdiction was not exercised properly by the court in keeping with the prescribed rules of the bail law, are the same I will interfere with bail. After the defendants have been properly allowed by the courts, the accused has been charged with canceling the bail. property advocate from Mehmood Kot lawyer