Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MEHRBAN versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE

Section 42 of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), section 454 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RR2 and 3 suits for permanent injunction restraining order, in addition to applicant violation His claim for a permanent injunction was also filed, pending a temporary injunction, the trial court issued a stay order, which, on the other hand, was withdrawn on the objection of the district judge, on appeal, a temporary injunction Was issued according to which the respondents were served, but they, in spite of the injunction, allegedly promoted the construction of the suit land and gave The District Judge dismissed the District Judge's violation of the order by the petitioners for initiating contempt proceedings against the petitioners and the proceedings against the respondents were dismissed, the petitioners filed an appeal before the High Court. Was dismissed, the appeal for appeal to the Supreme Court was dismissed by the petitioners in the lawsuit filed to persuade the High Court's contentious decision whether the reconstruction work on the alleged partner suit land was pending with the District Judge. The source withholding was made before or after the issuance of the order, in such cases Without a detailed inquiry, it cannot be said that the defendants deliberately disobeyed this order. The court had to deliberately disobey, in order to create a contempt court, the two courts below did not agree with the applicant's version, especially when the above-mentioned facts were discovered simultaneously by the six courts. Strong holiday breakthroughs were needed. The courts below jobs for advocates from Jaffarabad lawyer