MUHAMMAD YASEEN versus STATE
Section 6, 9 and 15 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), the application of Section 265K under Section 265K, the CCPC for the trial was mistaken because it was anywhere in the FIR It was not reported that the marijuana in question was purchased from the accused, Wright. Fugitives, but there was no fact to file a case against the fugitives and the alleged fugitives will remain until they are related to the required male, under the order 5 265 K, CR P. The application for the accused under C is excluded. And did not properly meet the arguments which were declared an unclean order and were sent to the trial court with the direction that the trial court would consult the record, concluding the conviction or acquittal of the offenders. Will consider the possibility of a final outcome of the case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Malakwal lawyer
