Find a Lawyer

TASAWAR HUSSAIN ALIAS TASSOO versus STATE

Section 2 (b (b)) was based on the definition of evidence, the reduction of sentence, the declaration of the deceased before his death, which was the testimony of the prosecutor who was the doctor's witness of the declaration of death. The witness was a witness and there was no cause for enmity against the accused. The above mentioned testimony is that the length of the deceased's declaration was cross examined at the doctor / witness before the deceased was declared dead. But his statement, which was natural and genuine, cannot be denied that the crime scene was recovered on the occasion of the Investigation Officer. With this, the pistol was recovered from the accused, from which the report of the accused in the forensic science laboratory was positive in nature. The court had to look at the quality of the evidence and not the quantity, applying the rules of the doctor. There was no evidence other than the deceased's declaration earlier: The safe administration of criminal justice, the accused's sentence was upheld, but with the benefit of his section 382B, CRPC, the death sentence changed to life imprisonment. Because the deceased's statement did not mention a motive, the trial court denied the testimony of four witnesses And the defendant presented copies of his defense evidence. During the course of his life, the death sentence of the four FIs against the victim was not confirmed and the murder reference was given a negative response. advocates from Kotli lawyer