Find a Lawyer

MST. IJAZ BEGUM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Article 32 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Representation before President Pakistan Maxim: udi Auditime Partem / Applicable authorities filed a representation claim against President Pakistan against the Federal Content Approval Order which was filed without notice to the applicant. Accepted the opportunity to hear a petition affecting his controversial order, which, as a mandatory party, was given the right to take part in the proceedings against him, but he was condemned in the unkind words of the President of Pakistan. Went, while performing his duties under Article 32 of the Office of the Ombudsman. Fresh. The Order, 1983, was to act in a quasi-judiciary, not in a judicial capacity, which, apart from administrative proceedings, violated the principles of natural justice in this case. Was without any legal effect and put aside by the HC, the questions of law and facts involved in the matter were not touched by the High Court and they had to be re-decided so the representation was postponed. Will go \ r \ n \ r \ n ask a advocate free from Leepa lawyer