The provisions of section 8 and 42 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 120 were challenged fraudulently for the transfer of the plaintiff's land in the name of the claimant by the gift mutation and challenged on 11 11 2000 filed on a fake suit. Confirmation of Gift Mutation 31 The evidence maintained on record on 31st 1987 shows that the plaintiff did not come to his village in the year 1987, but at the time of confirming the suit mutation, he was living with his husband in another district. Where she was posted was confirmed by the plaintiff's husband. By submitting such statement of the plaintiff that she had never returned to her village after the marriage, the plaintiff's special counsel had been completely unaware of the plaintiff's visit to her village when, according to the plaintiff's statement, When he examined it, he learned of the case change. Revenue record suit was within time \ r \ n \ r \ n in the circumstances of the plaintiff's information
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
