Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT ALI versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE

Section 12 (2) and OE XXII Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application comprises looted agricultural land was auctioned for five years' temporary cultivation The applicant and the appellant jointly acquired the same amount in equal shares. In order to exclude the other participant from the above figures. The litigation began, which ultimately decided the case in the writ petitions filed by the Member, Board of Revenue and the respondent and petitioner against the Punjab Province, in which a combined half of the bidders were leased. The section was told with lots and lots of orders. The decisions were challenged by two separate petitions under section 12 (2), the first writ filed by the present applicants objecting to the CPC's validity regarding the ability of the respondents to obtain the lease. The petition was legally raised before the Revenue authorities, so such an objection cannot be allowed. Under section 12 (2), the CPC was once again incapable of retaining such pleas and in such a high court, the judicial question in which the respondent obtained the lease on the basis of fake documents was based on facts. The dispute relating to the alleged dispute can be resolved before the Revenue Authorities, however, if it is said that the question was not resolved by the aforementioned forum and even in the writ petition filed earlier. If not considered, the application was authorized under Section 12 (2), CPC, an appeal against an unknown decision, before the Supreme Court, under Order XXII, c. Accept, submit, respond to the Additional Advocate General of the PC advocate from Shadiwal lawyer