NOOR MUHAMMAD versus FAZAL ELAHI
Section 42 law on the evidence (Article 10 of 1984), Article 129 (G) of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 42 suit, the trial court's appeal and the appeal for declaration on the basis of change of possession and failure was also failed. Judicial Plaintiffs relied on reparations based on oral sales and, as a result, only one witness was presented who did not present testimony regarding the sale case, which required three persons to appear. Named Plaintiffs withheld best evidence to prove repeat and sale, missing date, time and specific month and year of transaction, Id No witness was presented before the Revenue Officer or the official was presented. Both the courts correctly ruled. Circumstances dismissed \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer
