Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT ALIAS MEHDI versus STATE

The matter related to the reduction of the cases in section 2?2 (b) and the appreciation of the evidence ofre evidence, was immediately reported to the police, both the prosecution witnesses, although closely related to the subpoena, but on all material points The other had confirmed that as far as the accused's character was concerned that there was nothing in the record to reveal that the witnesses had any previous hatred or animosity against the accused. The witnesses also received support for the statement of the injured prosecutor's testimony, which cannot be ruled out, and his witness's statement was confirmed. Medical evidence was supported by statements of the prosecution witnesses at the time and place of the witnesses as well as the presence of witnesses at the scene and assisted by the recovery of the weapons from both the accused and the incident. This event was recovered from. The matter was too far away and no direct evidence was available to support the trial. The rest of the accused will not benefit from the prosecution because the allegations against them were not supported by the medical evidence and the trial court Took advantage of the suspect and acquitted him, the prosecutor successfully proved his case through an ocular account, which was supported by medical evidence and filed an FIR without delay. Violent situations such as recovery recovered the trial court while an accused was convicted under section 30302 (b). The PPC sentenced him to life imprisonment while he sentenced the other to death. The trial court offered that both the defendants be sentenced at the time of sentencing property advocates from Kohistan lawyer