Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ ALIAS TARA versus STATE

Clause 2 30 evidence, evidence evidence and Comp 34 Although the complainant was the deceased's real brother and the witness of the other injured prosecutor was the real uncle of the deceased, but the close relation of the prosecution witnesses has no basis for rejecting their evidence. Especially when one of these witnesses was received. The man with firearm injuries said the prosecution's witness on the scene was a natural occurrence. The suspect in the incident of the day had no doubt in the identity of a suspect, without loss was immediately filed an FIR, which dismissed any fraud. During his statements and numerous scrutiny, he was confused. The statements of eyewitnesses who have been encouraged to trust can be completely relied upon. Firearms expert's report is positive in relation to the weapons of the crime, recovery of weapons from suspect in connection with firearm, ready for trial of litigation under the circumstances Dennis fully confirms the prosecution's case. There was no reason for the victim's injured brother and the perpetrator of the incident to testify for the prosecution of the alternate suspect, the incident took place in a busy market daylight, with no evidence in defense of the defendant's plea. The request was not to prove it. The witness was presented to the Investigation Officer by the accused in support of his substitution request, and the accused did not present any testimony in his defense in the court prosecution, and he raised his case against the accused with reasonable doubt. Was proven, he was rightly punished and sentenced to death. The accused advocate from Phool nagar lawyer