Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus STATE

The testimony of Sections 302 (b), 109 and 34 was fully corroborated by the medical evidence in the ocular account that the accused was expected to have abducted his sister, both the accused on the day of the incident, with hatches He was injured. Parts of the victim's body that led to his death resulted in blood stains and blood-stained clothes that were sent to the accused, who was sent to the Chemical Examiner and the chemical executor and serologist. According to the report, hatchets and clothes were stained with human blood. The incident was a pervasive daylight and the parties knew each other. The accused could not prove that they were under the age of eighteen at the time of the incident. It was established that the accused persons were over 20 years of age at that time. Prove that it is a matter of family honor that the accused never saw his sister on the day of the incident or before the unlawful incident condolences with the deceased, as she died 1 // years ago before the incident. On this occasion, there is no question of the prosecution's action or retrial, in which their appeal was dismissed and no mitigating circumstances may be available in favor of the accused. Confirmation of his death sentence property advocate from Larkana lawyer