RASHID AHMED versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ
Section 302 (b) / 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the appeal against acquittal by the High Court is not mentioned in the FIR of the prosecution witness but it has been introduced later, the complainant. No statements were found in the statements of the accomplices from any independent source, which included the recovery of disputed articles, which themselves were skeptical, medical evidence contradicts the ocular testimony; Nor was the result of neglecting evidence of any significant interference. Therefore, by the Supreme Court, the appeal was sought for dismissal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Larkana lawyer
