Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUZAFFAR versus MAQSOOD-UL-HASSAN

The effect of the preparation of the Order on the implementation of the specific performance decision of Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Section 2 (2) and 47 of the Agreement was compromised and the trial date was set on the first date. The trial court dismissed the trial. Because of the proceedings, the plaintiff filed an application for execution which was followed by the court but the appellate court rejected the execution on the ground that since no order was prepared, it could not be processed. Which is why the order passed by the appellate court was upheld by the high court. The request submitted by the plaintiff was that as the parties had reached an agreement, therefore, the decision was plausible. When the case was dismissed because of the trial and the trial court did not produce a decree, there was no question of filing an execution. Such an order can be followed by the High Court rightly rejecting the amendment and practically not seeking the intervention of the Supreme Court to appeal the jurisdiction under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution. Was denied lawer from fb area from Mamu kunjan lawyer