Find a Lawyer

LUQMAN ZAREEN AND OTHERS versus SECRETARY EDUCATION, N.-W.F.P. AND OTHERS

Section 8 Promotion Acting Charge Promotion Date Determined Government employees were promoted on the basis of Acting Charge on 31 acting 2000 but the Departmental Promotion Committee issued a notification to Government Employees on their complaint on 27 5 2003 that at that time Their progress was not considered. He was promoted on the basis of a charge of development which was told to the civil servant to hold a high position after which he was regularly promoted, until that time he was entitled to the salary associated with the post. ? It is also entitled to any other benefits, which may be associated as such, if the post contained a vacancy in the higher cadre in which a civil servant was eligible to be promoted on a permanent basis but on the basis of a mistake He was not given so much development and was instead put on such a position based on offseason, then on his regular development in such a position, the public servant would be considered as much as M From the day they were allowed to hold the office, unless there were valid reasons, the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal. The Supreme Court declared the government employees to be considered, altering the decision passed by the service tribunal. 31 8 may be promulgated from 2000 and no appeal was allowed from 27 5 2003 online advocate from Matli lawyer