Find a Lawyer

I.-G. (PRISONS) N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR AND OTHERS versus MUHAMMAD ISRAIL, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT JAIL, HARIPUR

CHAPTER 41 and RR 724 and 1002 Northwestern Frontier Province Tribunals Act (Constitution of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 187 Supreme Court hundred jurisdiction over five prisoners imprisoned for using enhanced penalties The escaped deputy inquiry assistant superintendent and four warders were found responsible for the incident. The assistant superintendent was sentenced to the lowest level at the present time scale, while the warders were dismissed from the service tribunal. Allowed employees' appeals and changed warders from fines to corruption To prevent three increments without a cumulative effect, while the Assistant Superintendent was acquitted of the charges and his criminal review service tribunal was set aside, while putting the entire burden on the shoulders of the accused warder. It was denied that the Assistant Superintendent who was responsible for the efficient and proper evacuation of the ob. Any negligence of the ligations and staff by its subsidiaries meant that it was aided by a growing negligence that the Assistant. The superintendent did not bring the record to prove that he was on duty at the time of the service tribunal's presence. Upon cancellation of his responsibilities by the Assistant Superintendent, the incident, high office could not be maintained, there were responsibilities and serious responsibilities and his negligence resulted from the services tribunal. Applying the Assistant Superintendent to apologize for the allegations of neglect resulted in a serious misrepresentation and misunderstanding resulting in misunderstanding us immigration advocates from Sahiwal lawyer